Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81H5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81H5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180531
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 14 '20 at 07:20
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-9225 RADEON R4, 5 COMPUTE CORES 2C+3G
Socket FT4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 63
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 75.4
42% 65 Pts
4-Core 71
8-Core 67.1
9% 69.1 Pts
64-Core 67.1
4% 67.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39F5) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 19.10.30.12
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 7.27
Parallax 4.62
3% 5.13 fps
MRender 4.14
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.13
4% 4.26 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
434GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 47 64 72 81 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 94
Write 90.1
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 63.7
50% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 63%
hp v178p 16GB
6GB free, PID 1940
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 5.7 6.9 7.7 7.8 7.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Read 4
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 6.4
4% 3.22 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.3% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 8.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.57 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 24.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81H5 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81H5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback