Today's hottest deals

Asus X553MA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus X553MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X553MA
Memory1.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141225
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 10 '20 at 12:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2840
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 16.8
2-Core 25.2
25% 32.5 Pts
4-Core 29.9
8-Core 36.2
4% 33 Pts
64-Core 31.1
2% 31.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Asus(1043 161D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.82% Terrible
Lighting 0.83
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.95 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.48
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.82%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
334GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 53 40 25 47 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 53.3
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 43.7
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 64GB
57GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 4 3.8 3.8 4.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 4.1
9% 9.45 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3.7
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.2 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X553MA Builds (Compare 531 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X553MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback