Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive51.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 89% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAcer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Aquila_KL
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180312
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 20:01
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 15%
CPU Throttled 89%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 67.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 431
8-Core 539
62% 485 Pts
64-Core 543
34% 543 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 126 122 124 127 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 381
Write 125
Mixed 149
SusWrite 126
43% 195 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 15
60% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 121
118% 194 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 70%
DISK 32GB
18GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.3 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
4.79% Terrible
Read 16.3
Write 7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 8.1
11% 8.98 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.79%
Great: 10%
OV-USB USB DISK 64GB
22GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.4 1.9 3.9 5.5 6.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.37% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 1.7
Mixed 10
SusWrite 4.3
9% 7.88 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
13% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.37%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9D8MD-16 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12.8
42% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P2510-G2-MG Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P2510-G2-MG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback