Today's hottest deals

DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDELL Studio XPS 435T/9000  (all builds)
MotherboardDELL 0X501H
Memory10.8 GB free of 15 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 09 '20 at 01:56
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 116
56% 88.3 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 290
31% 248 Pts
64-Core 316
20% 316 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.67
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.78
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 3.83
Splatting 6.09
4% 5.15 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2316RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 180 214 217 222 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.7% Average
Read 218
Write 200
Mixed 144
SusWrite 202
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 16.6
58% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 143
DQ Mixed 102
90% 133 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
881GB free
Firmware: CC3E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 98 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 118
Write 100
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 96.6
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 15GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.07 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 7.7
21% 7.23 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 473 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $174
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback