ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ProLiant MicroServerr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP ProLiant MicroServerr (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 18:23
Run Duration	201 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II Neo N36L Dual-Core 91 User benchmarks, average bench 30% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	33% Below average	Memory 59.9 1-Core 19.7 2-Core 38.3 29% 39.3 Pts	4-Core 39 8-Core 38.2 5% 38.6 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250 11,054 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 1609) 64MB Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.632.1.2000 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	0.21% Terrible	Lighting 0.07 Reflection 0.85 Parallax 0.44 0% 0.45 fps	MRender 0.62 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 0.87 0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.21% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.ADJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 16 23 23 26 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13% Very poor	Read 25 Write 43.8 Mixed 10 SusWrite 20.2 18% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 144GB free Firmware: 3.ADJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 68 68 68 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 62.5 Write 63.7 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 68 40% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 40%
VB0160EAVEQ 160GB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 143GB free Firmware: HPG0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 100 101 100 102 103 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 102 Write 33.8 Mixed 59 SusWrite 100 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 58%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 148GB free Firmware: 3.ADJ SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 67 66 68 67 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 66 Mixed 22.3 SusWrite 66.6 40% 54.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.5% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 5.7 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3 SC Mixed 4 10% 3.6 GB/s	Latency 128 31% 128 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback