Performance Results


Gaming 92% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 79% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Alienware Aurora R8 (all builds)
Motherboard	Alienware 0R3FWM
Memory	9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191105
Uptime	9.7 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '20 at 00:51
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600K-$137 321,194 User benchmarks, average bench 93% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	Memory 88.8 1-Core 137 2-Core 275 92% 167 Pts	4-Core 538 8-Core 730 80% 634 Pts	64-Core 752 47% 752 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 103%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Dell(1028 3735) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.41 Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.8% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 110 Parallax 109 95% 112 fps	MRender 159 Gravity 115 Splatting 94 97% 123 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.8% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg60znv256g NVMe TOSHIBA 256GB 4,018 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10604106 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1527 390 395 402 393 399 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	235% Outstanding	Read 1,800 Write 1,620 Mixed 1,242 SusWrite 584 293% 1,312 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 148 4K Mixed 70.4 243% 89.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,143 DQ Write 1,223 DQ Mixed 748 683% 1,038 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 235% Great: 242%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 147GB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 146 137 141 139 140 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	62.9% Good	Read 79.7 Write 107 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 140 70% 95.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 113%
aigo 320GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 228GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.57% Terrible	Read 12.2 Write 12 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 14.5 17% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 14% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.57% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	76.1% Very good	MC Read 30.9 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 23.3 79% 27.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.4 SC Write 23.3 SC Mixed 21.7 58% 20.5 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.1% Great: 88%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 96%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
NVMe SK hynix 256GBPc401Bench 118%, 9,137 samples	88x
NVMe TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 184%, 4,018 samples	58x
NVMe TOSHIBA 1024GBKxg60znv1t02Bench 228%, 2,759 samples	54x

RAM
HMA81GU6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 4,647 samples	161x
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6E1 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 9,471 samples	152x
XJ69DF-MIE 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 2,831 samples	141x

Value: 111% - Outstanding

Total price: $442

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16