Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung Samsung DeskTop System  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG SAMSUNG_DT1234567890
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 06:31
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G3240-$53
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 55.2
1-Core 68.8
2-Core 125
48% 83.1 Pts
4-Core 108
8-Core 137
16% 122 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Sanyo(144D B096) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.15.4279
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tammuz SSD 240GB
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 99 16 8.6 41 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 492
Write 281
Mixed 11
SusWrite 73.3
47% 214 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 0.3
21% 7.1 MB/s
DQ Read 58.5
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 12.1
14% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
460GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 130 131 130 130 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 128
Write 127
Mixed 65.3
SusWrite 130
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.6
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.3
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 143
28% 143 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Samsung DeskTop System Builds (Compare 1,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung Samsung DeskTop System

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $60
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback