MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 07 '20 at 06:17
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 63%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$495
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 83.6
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
97% 180 Pts
4-Core 602
8-Core 1167
105% 884 Pts
64-Core 2,812
174% 2,812 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 864B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48
Reflection 32.9
Parallax 39.8
39% 40.3 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 38
33% 40.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 37%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$167
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM11.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1107 2281 2354 2803 2406 2161 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 1,621
Write 2,802
Mixed 1,404
SusWrite 2,185
455% 2,003 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 55.2
172% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,382
DQ Write 1,222
DQ Mixed 1,321
985% 1,308 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 310%
Great: 496%
Fantom Drives 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 253 247 296 333 330 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 238
Write 270
Mixed 175
SusWrite 290
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 17.5
60% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 21
44% 82.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 74%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$255
2TB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 253 246 296 334 331 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 373
Write 309
Mixed 239
SusWrite 290
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 29.6
97% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 125 126 139 148 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 133
Write 113
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 136
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 77%
Great: 101%
WD Gold 4TB (2016)-$99
3.5TB free
Firmware: MFAOAA50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 147 161 168 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 156
Write 154
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 158
95% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 46.2
MC Write 39.2
MC Mixed 40.7
120% 42 GB/s
SC Read 25.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 35.8
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 112%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,770
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback