Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151102
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 09:23
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 130
53% 88.6 Pts
4-Core 208
8-Core 210
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 203
13% 203 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500
Asus(1043 04BC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1274 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Relative performance (0th percentile)
8.96% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 35.9
0% 21.8 fps
MRender 31.5
Gravity 30.4
Splatting 33.7
26% 31.8 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 8.96%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225L9A300 250GB-$30
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBEOC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 29 25 30 36 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 29.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 29.9
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 36%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
354GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 105 106 106 105 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 103
Write 96.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 106
118% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
164% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 49%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB
19GB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 23 19 23 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 16.2
Write 17.3
Mixed 13
SusWrite 20.8
23% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0- Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C 10GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.2% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 8.6
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 36%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3 Builds (Compare 173 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3 - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $251
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback