Emachines ET1850

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemEmachines ET1850  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1850
Memory0.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '20 at 03:33
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E6700-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45% Average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 45.4
2-Core 76.3
44% 66.2 Pts
4-Core 80.5
8-Core 82.4
11% 81.4 Pts
64-Core 77.2
5% 77.2 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 038E) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.56
0% 0.59 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 159 155 170 189 166 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.9% Below average
Read 202
Write 103
Mixed 103
SusWrite 169
32% 144 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 21.9
4K Mixed 14
54% 17.5 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 22.4
DQ Mixed 18.3
14% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 27.2
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 18.6
20% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 98%
WD Elements 25A3 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 33
Write 27
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 16.6
34% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673FH0-CH9 80AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 3GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.77 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1850 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1850

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $58
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback