Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

Performance Results


Gaming 30% Raft	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 23% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+ (all builds)
Memory	21 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 02 '20 at 15:33
Run Duration	134 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7890K APU (2014 D.Ka)-$889 6,638 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Memory 72.2 1-Core 72.8 2-Core 143 57% 95.9 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 230 29% 220 Pts	64-Core 223 14% 223 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% PowerColor(148C 2379) CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2101 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.12.3 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.2% Above average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 73.8 Parallax 82.7 49% 72.1 fps	MRender 75 Gravity 59.9 Splatting 61.6 53% 65.5 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
As25 480GB 480GB 410 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 325GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X14c07 SusWrite @10s intervals: 291 342 351 348 361 339 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 341 Write 300 Mixed 287 SusWrite 339 71% 317 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 29.7 103% 37.8 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 222 DQ Mixed 185 144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 105%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 343GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 416 428 423 438 356 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	98.3% Outstanding	Read 462 Write 423 Mixed 417 SusWrite 402 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 44 140% 47 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 251 189% 254 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 98.3% Great: 129%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-17000CL11-4GBXL F3-17000CL11-4GBXL Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	40.2% Average	MC Read 18 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 16.1 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.1 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 11.4 28% 9.73 GB/s	Latency 96.3 42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 40.2% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A75M Pro4+ Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A75M Pro4+

CPU
Athlon II X4 750KAMD $45Bench 51%, 5,882 samples	4x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	3x
A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)AMD $119Bench 50%, 18,312 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7560DAMDBench 4%, 10,029 samples	2x
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	2x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x
INTENSO 256GBBench 72%, 4,055 samples	1x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG Nanya M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG 16GBHynixBench 31%, 7 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 35% - Below average

Total price: $145

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353