HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3396
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 30 '19 at 19:54
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 106 2-Core 199 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 332 8-Core 510 52% 421 Pts	64-Core 510 32% 510 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8627) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.0 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Lighting 39 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 37.3 32% 35.8 fps	MRender 38.5 Gravity 38.5 Splatting 36.4 31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 329 346 346 343 343 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Read 268 Write 325 Mixed 273 SusWrite 342 68% 302 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 53.6 4K Mixed 29.3 98% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 29.8 DQ Write 108 DQ Mixed 42 40% 59.9 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 113%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 822GB free Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 99 99 97 98 96 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 98.2 Write 87.6 Mixed 58 SusWrite 97.3 63% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 109%
CCR-70 2GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 2GB free, PID e0ed Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.2 7.1 7.1 7.2 7 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 6 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 7 9% 7.55 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Kingston ACR16D3LU1KBG/4G HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	39.8% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.9 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 14.3 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 2,780 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,052x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	975x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	406x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	383x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	340x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	209x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	120x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	67x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	42x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	49x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	27x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363