PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 22GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 22GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P6T (all builds) |
Memory | 16.3 GB free of 22 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100308 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Dec 29 '19 at 18:05 |
Run Duration | 154 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 21% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
66.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
30.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
ST2000DX002-2DV164 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 174 167 169 169 159 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 101 107 81 79 64 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
HDS72808 0PLAT20 82GB
9GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 6.9 6.9 7.9 9.1 8.3 MB/s
|
3%
Terrible
|
|||
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1 1TB
683GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 18 MB/s
|
11.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 22GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 570x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 145x |
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 72x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 78x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 64x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 51x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $318 |