bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics0.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel DP67BA
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120316
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 19:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 178
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 456
46% 375 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 570
Nvidia(10DE 0474) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.54% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.38
1% 0.49 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.39
0% 0.39 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.54%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 506ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 115 102 120 111 100 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 267
Write 180
Mixed 208
SusWrite 114
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 51.2
4K Mixed 30.4
105% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 126
116% 178 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 87%
TOSHIBA MK4032GAX 40GB
2GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 25.7
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 17.2
31% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 16%
ST340014 AS 40GB
27GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 24.8
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 27.2
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,532 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback