Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080303
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 26 '19 at 14:50
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 45.9
2-Core 90.1
45% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 88.4
8-Core 90.1
12% 89.2 Pts
64-Core 91.3
6% 91.3 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3870
Device(1545 3950) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 5% Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus XT SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$35
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: TD27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 41 72 76 84 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 98.2
Write 78.6
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 70
56% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
40GB free
Firmware: ZM100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 43 43 44 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 39.8
Write 44.6
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 43.3
30% 40.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 33%
USB 2.0 SD MMC Reader 2GB
2GB free, PID 8123
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 3.9 3.9 3.9 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
2.81% Terrible
Read 9.3
Write 3.5
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 3.9
6% 5.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.81%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.3
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 4.4
13% 4.67 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MA69G-S3H Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA69G-S3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 6% - Terrible Total price: $196
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback