PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 40.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asrock 970 Pro3 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 3200 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20160531 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 26 '19 at 07:35 |
Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
53.5%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 315 298 302 279 279 MB/s
|
78.3%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
331GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 96 97 97 95 97 MB/s
|
54.8%
Above average
|
|||
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
185GB free
Firmware: 03.03E03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 76 75 76 MB/s
|
48.9%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT4G3D1869DT1TX0. 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz clocked @ 400 MHz
|
28.1%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 193x |
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 191x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 63x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 53x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 33x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $152 |