Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M4A89GTD-PRO (all builds)
Memory	2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '19 at 20:52
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340 12,769 User benchmarks, average bench 59% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 82.4 1-Core 50.4 2-Core 96.9 50% 76.6 Pts	4-Core 183 8-Core 270 28% 226 Pts	64-Core 278 17% 278 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% PwrHis(1787 3000) 3GB CLim: 930 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	32.1% Below average	Lighting 41.5 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 52 34% 40.9 fps	MRender 28.4 Gravity 38.6 Splatting 37.1 29% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 73 75 77 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.8% Average	Read 192 Write 158 Mixed 152 SusWrite 70 32% 143 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 26.5 92% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 29.2 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 36.9 33% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 124%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 81GB free Firmware: GG2OACY0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 75 76 76 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	Read 53.2 Write 49.2 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 76 36% 50.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 86% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 58%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 2TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 80 74 66 81 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 15.5 Write 53.3 Mixed 15.3 SusWrite 73 28% 39.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 35% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 230GB free Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 111 Write 106 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 36.7 59% 80.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 4GB free Firmware: 12.01C02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 37 37 37 37 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	20.7% Poor	Read 34.9 Write 37 Mixed 30 SusWrite 36.6 26% 34.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-152.A00LF 3x2GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 3 of 4 slots used 6GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.9% Poor	MC Read 12.4 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 9.8 28% 9.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 8.6 19% 6.67 GB/s	Latency 76.3 52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A89GTD-PRO Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	7x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	7x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	7x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples	3x
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	3x

SSD
Green 240GB (2018)WD $52Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
Solid State Disk 128GBSpccBench 69%, 14,793 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	3x
CT51264BA160BJ.C8F CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 350 samples	2x
Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 16GBUnknownBench 41%, 48 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $286

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16