Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100125
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateDec 12 '19 at 12:59
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
49% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 48.7
2-Core 97.5
45% 72 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 175
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 49%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.6% Average
Lighting 48.2
Reflection 51
Parallax 52
39% 50.4 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 61.9
Splatting 54.3
49% 60.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 499 0.5 302 193 144 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
831GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 57 0.5 28 25 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 91
Write 76
Mixed 64.3
SusWrite 28.3
48% 64.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 76%
Mirror 1TB
440GB free
Firmware: 0000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 28 0.5 14 14 7.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 104
Write 38.8
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 14.2
39% 52 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 95%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
661GB free
Firmware: 05.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 53 0.5 25 20 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 77.8
Write 66
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 24.9
42% 56.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 76%
ASMT 2105 4TB
730GB free, PID 1053
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 57 0.5 26 24 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 78.3
Write 74
Mixed 33
SusWrite 27.8
67% 53.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.2% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 6.8
20% 7.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP45-UD3R Builds (Compare 121 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP45-UD3R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback