Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo P9600-$190 524 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Memory 32 1-Core 7.6 2-Core 14 14% 17.9 Pts	4-Core 14.7 8-Core 14.9 2% 14.8 Pts	64-Core 15.6 1% 15.6 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD2500BJKT-75F4T0 250GB 689 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 216GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 58 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 57.4 Write 58.2 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 57.2 40% 54.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 45%
PHD 2.0 Silicon-Power 500GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 193GB free, PID 0940 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.49% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 17.5 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 19.2 25% 19 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.49% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.85% Terrible	MC Read 2.6 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.8 6% 2.1 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 1.6 SC Mixed 2 5% 1.87 GB/s	Latency 243 16% 243 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.85% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	14x
Core2 Duo T9600Intel $170Bench 39%, 2,726 samples	13x
Core2 Duo P8700Intel $42Bench 37%, 7,366 samples	11x

GPU
Quadro NVS 160MNvidiaBench 1%, 1,458 samples	52x
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	5x
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M(pe64)Bench 0%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
120GB 120GBXraydiskBench 60%, 543 samples	2x
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	2x
X25-M 160GBIntelBench 36%, 7,078 samples	2x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $42

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16