Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121220
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '19 at 16:29
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 101
2-Core 166
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 351
43% 327 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
XFX(1682 3264) 2GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1260 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.7
Reflection 22.8
Parallax 31.9
20% 26.5 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 35.6
24% 27.6 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF5000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 11 21 9.4 101 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 354
Write 281
Mixed 207
SusWrite 76.4
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 17.9
57% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19.7
DQ Write 24.9
DQ Mixed 21.5
16% 22 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 56%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
31GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 59 59 59 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
34.1% Below average
Read 59.5
Write 60.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 59
40% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 99U5474-038.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 8.1
MC Mixed 7.1
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.2
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 68.9
58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Q77M-D2H Builds (Compare 150 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Q77M-D2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback