Asus A8V-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus A8V-VM (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20070105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '16 at 07:56
Run Duration	859 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 4000+ 23 User benchmarks, average bench 33% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	43.1% Average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 34.5 2-Core 34.5 39% 50.2 Pts	4-Core 30.7 8-Core 33.9 4% 32.3 Pts	64-Core 34.4 2% 34.4 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT 27,834 User benchmarks, average bench 2% POV(1ACC 909A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.96 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.83 Reflection 1.85 Parallax 0.72 2% 1.47 fps	MRender 0.67 Gravity 1.73 Splatting 1.04 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$128 11,448 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 230GB free Firmware: 05.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	58.2% Above average	Read 113 Write 89.7 Mixed 95.3 75% 99.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.23 4K Write 2.28 4K Mixed 0.39 137% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 74%
WD WD800JD-75MSA3 80GB-$105 18,464 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: 07.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 41.7 Write 39.9 Mixed 41.2 31% 40.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.29 4K Mixed 0.41 97% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 33%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 26GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.79% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 7.06 Mixed 7.51 12% 11.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.15 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.006 23% 2.06 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.79% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 24.3 Write 2.83 Mixed 4.62 9% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 3.04 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.37 35% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 8%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 1GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 14.9 Write 7.31 Mixed 9.46 12% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.27 4K Write 0.02 4K Mixed 0.02 10% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 1024, 1024, 512, 512 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 2.9 11% 3.97 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A8V-VM Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: Asus A8V-VM

CPU
Athlon 64 3500+AMD $54Bench 33%, 480 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	1x

RAM
2GBUnknownBench 15%, 9,823 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $54

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359

Asus A8V-VM

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus A8V-VM

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)