HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	1.81% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20110609
Uptime	16 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '15 at 08:36
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	SAU-User
Background CPU	34%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$173 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 85.2 2-Core 166 57% 126 Pts	4-Core 292 8-Core 485 48% 389 Pts	64-Core 489 30% 489 Pts
Poor: 54% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Gigabyte(1458 3623) 2GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.5012 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.81% Terrible	Lighting 2.13 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 1.94 2% 2.15 fps	MRender 2.81 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.13 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.81% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 614GB free Firmware: HP63 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 161048352 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5689 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 83 60 216621492 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24536 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 535 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1768820613 (B7) Unknown 1 1 153 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 327714 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 57 722993189 (C2) HDA temperature 37 43 64424509477 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 50 15 161048352 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 6 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	103% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 162 Mixed 143 125% 167 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 3.71 4K Mixed 0.94 206% 1.81 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 614GB free Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 204 (03) Spinup time 142 140 3858 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1133 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 79 79 15831 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 483 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 37 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1095 (C2) HDA temperature 104 100 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	106% Outstanding	Read 210 Write 158 Mixed 146 128% 171 MB/s	4K Read 0.81 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.81 183% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 330GB free (System drive) Firmware: 15.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 136 4125 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1052 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27514 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 518 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 93 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 958 (C2) HDA temperature 101 94 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
ST500LM0 21-1KJ152 500GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 262GB free, PID 6388 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 23.1 Mixed 15 28% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.87 4K Mixed 0.25 41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,776 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	687x
Core i7-2600Intel $173Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	599x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	318x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	143x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	56x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	30x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)