Gigabyte GA-MFHM17P-00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive293% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGIGABYTE GB-BNi7HG6-1060
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MFHM17P-00  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '19 at 04:33
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 211
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 603
60% 490 Pts
64-Core 589
36% 589 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 D005) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.34
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 70.7
Parallax 58
49% 63.1 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 59.7
Splatting 68.3
54% 65.2 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
415GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1527 943 614 610 617 619 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
293% Outstanding
Read 2468
Write 1,822
Mixed 1,223
SusWrite 822
352% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 65
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 90.9
303% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 1,008
DQ Mixed 1,098
826% 1,107 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 293%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-MFHM17P-00 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MFHM17P-00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback