Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 0.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Memory 21 1-Core 4.7 2-Core 8.9 9% 11.5 Pts	4-Core 17.5 8-Core 18.1 2% 17.8 Pts	64-Core 26.6 2% 26.6 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4444 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 1.58 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.43 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 1.61 1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 930GB free, PID 0735 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 120 112 107 125 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.4% Average	Read 116 Write 130 Mixed 68.6 SusWrite 117 146% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 101% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 48%
Ut165 4GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 0165 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 3.7 4 4 4 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.96% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 2.7 Mixed 5 SusWrite 4 8% 8.48 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.96% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 4.4 13% 4.67 GB/s	SC Read 0.4 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 313 13% 313 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	487x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	478x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	460x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1,368x
Atermiter 2x8GBUnknownBench 59%, 2,316 samples	489x
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	354x

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16