TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Apple MacBookPro12,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemApple MacBookPro12,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-E43C1C25D4880AD6
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '15 at 23:42
Run Duration319 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5257U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 106
2-Core 198
70% 152 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 303
40% 297 Pts
64-Core 297
18% 297 Pts
Poor: 34% Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 013F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4112
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 10.6
10% 10.8 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 8
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.25 fps
Poor: 4% ↑
This bench: 8.9%
 Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ-VERT EX2 120GB
12GB free (System drive), PID 2509
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.8% Excellent
Read 174
Write 93.4
Mixed 123
154% 130 MB/s
4K Read 14.7
4K Write 12.6
4K Mixed 7.45
737% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 16.3
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 8.14
1,341% 18 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 87.8%
 Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
3GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 4.11
Mixed 5.43
7% 5.68 MB/s
4K Read 3.21
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
13% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 2.77%
 Great: 8%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MacBookPro12,1 Builds (Compare 276 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro12,1

CPU
Core i5-5257UIntelBench 55%, 3,465 samples175x
Core i7-5557UIntelBench 61%, 1,590 samples51x
Core i5-5287UIntelBench 58%, 444 samples50x
GPU
Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)IntelBench 6%, 5,403 samples276x
SSD
SM0512G PCIe 500GBAppleBench 162%, 1,474 samples71x
SM0256G PCIe 251GBAppleBench 149%, 1,022 samples58x
SM0128G PCIe 121GBAppleBench 143%, 564 samples21x
RAM
0x483943434E4E4E424C54414C41522D4E5544 2x4GBUnknownBench 55%, 671 samples79x
0x4B3445364533303445452D45474346 2x4GBUnknownBench 55%, 545 samples55x
0x4544464132333241324D412D4A442D46 2x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 474 samples49x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback