Lenovo 80XS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 80XS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171129
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 23:14
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A12-9720P APU (2016 M.BR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
42.1% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 61.2
2-Core 105
46% 75.4 Pts
4-Core 146
8-Core 110
18% 128 Pts
64-Core 153
10% 153 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
Legend(17AA 39FF) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 10.2
6% 8.99 fps
MRender 6.43
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 8.39
6% 7.64 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
738GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 45 70 91 101 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 90.8
Mixed 56.5
SusWrite 76.8
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 79%
SONY Storage Media 0GB
0GB free, PID 01f9
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1.66% Terrible
Read 5.3
Write 1
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.5
3% 2.45 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
12% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.66%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 127
32% 127 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80XS Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80XS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback