Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20BTS4CC00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20BTS4CC00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20BTS4CC00
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '19 at 11:41
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 51.5
1-Core 59.3
2-Core 116
44% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 80.1
8-Core 172
15% 126 Pts
64-Core 185
11% 185 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2227) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
4.03% Terrible
Lighting 4.17
Reflection 5.69
Parallax 5.19
3% 5.02 fps
MRender 5.81
Gravity 3.93
Splatting 8.61
5% 6.12 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.03%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GB-$290
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW25L0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 501 553 608 602 594 562 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 765
Write 727
Mixed 573
SusWrite 570
148% 659 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 26.8
84% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 272
194% 248 MB/s
Poor: 114%
This bench: 102%
Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTS1G64HDZ-1G6A1 E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Chip DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 10
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 9.2
21% 7.3 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback