Today's hottest deals

IBM System x3300 M4: -[7382E2G]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIBM System x3300 M4: -[7382E2G]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 00AK877
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '19 at 15:09
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2420 0
Socket 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 125
56% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 361
37% 299 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 63%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 11 13 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 15.1
Mixed 16.2
SusWrite 14
13% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 108%
Hua723020ala640 59Y5485 59Y1811IBM 2TB
964GB free
Firmware: MK7OA930
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 113
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ81RF4ECFA-DJ-F 2x8GB
2 of 12 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 9.9
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.87 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 7.2
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback