Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100531
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 21 '19 at 11:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 74.2
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 89.2
45% 69.5 Pts
4-Core 89.6
8-Core 88.2
12% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 89.6
6% 89.6 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 42 28 44 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 59.2
Write 68.3
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 37.9
33% 45 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
98% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 28%
Great: 59%
Seagate ST380811AS 80GB-$99
39GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 45 31 45 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 25.6
Mixed 34
SusWrite 39.9
28% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 40%
WD My Passport 25E7 1TB
34GB free, PID 25e7
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 28 22 28 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 28.7
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 26
37% 28.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
80% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
21% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 5.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 6.4
17% 5.87 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI Builds (Compare 69 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-AM IN/ROEM/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $137
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback