Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics88.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B150M-D3H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B150M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161107
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 17:39
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 53%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$46
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 138
72% 114 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 314
30% 246 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 114
Parallax 96
92% 107 fps
MRender 96.4
Gravity 99.8
Splatting 102
82% 99.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 276 270 268 269 267 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 443
Write 426
Mixed 412
SusWrite 290
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 62
206% 75.4 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 362
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 116%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
459GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 133 132 136 139 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 164
Write 162
Mixed 74
SusWrite 136
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86%
Great: 113%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 37.2
Write 36.7
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 4.8
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 72%
WDC WD64 00AAKS-22A7B2 640GB
9GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 34.7
Write 38.8
Mixed 28
SusWrite 37.1
48% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 42%
WDC WD10 EVVS-63E1B1 1TB
319GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 36.3
Write 36.3
Mixed 23.5
SusWrite 41.2
47% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD KHX2400C15D4/4G 859B BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 24.8
76% 26.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 23.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B150M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 2,412 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B150M-D3H - $95

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $371
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback