Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350M-DS3H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190416
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 19 '19 at 06:37
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 668
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 852
53% 852 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.88% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 0.59
2% 1.94 fps
MRender 2.57
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 1.96
2% 2.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.88%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 53 40 52 57 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 87
Write 94
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 51
53% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
169% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 52%
Samsung SP0411C/R 40GB
35GB free
Firmware: UU100-05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 53 53 53 53 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 48.3
Write 53
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 52.8
35% 47.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.4% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350M-DS3H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $298
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback