Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L300D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L300D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080916
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 09:00
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Sempron 3600+
Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 91.8
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 26.9
39% 47 Pts
4-Core 27.5
8-Core 28.8
4% 28.1 Pts
64-Core 23.6
2% 23.6 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon X1250
Toshiba(1179 FF68) 128MB
Driver: atiumd64.dll Ver. 8.593.100.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.13
Reflection 0.15
0% 0.14 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543212L9SA00 120GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FBBOC43C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.4 15 14 16 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
6.29% Terrible
Read 8.9
Write 9.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 13
7% 9.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.29%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4.2
12% 4.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L300D Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Toshiba Satellite L300D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback