Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '19 at 01:50
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.4% Very good
Memory 75.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 229
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 435
8-Core 438
58% 436 Pts
64-Core 483
30% 483 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750
Nvidia(10DE 1407) 2GB
CLim: 1240 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 20.2
Parallax 18.2
16% 19.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 27.2
20% 23.5 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UG2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 156 209 205 210 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 431
Write 383
Mixed 247
SusWrite 199
70% 315 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 11.9
64% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 74.3
DQ Mixed 21.9
36% 69.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 61%
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
158GB free
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 134 78 148 151 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 441
Write 362
Mixed 309
SusWrite 151
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 17.6
72% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 84
DQ Mixed 41.1
47% 81.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-010.A00G 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87% Excellent
MC Read 32
MC Write 33.3
MC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.6
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 87%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $336
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback