Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.1% Above average	Memory 84.8 1-Core 82.8 2-Core 121 61% 96.1 Pts	4-Core 195 8-Core 203 26% 199 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0D8) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.67% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 5.35 Parallax 2.75 3% 4.05 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 7.7 4% 5.02 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.67% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC400 128GB-$75 747 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 69GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM001A SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 232 290 278 236 229 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Read 438 Write 398 Mixed 289 SusWrite 239 76% 341 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 34.2 4K Mixed 22.5 72% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 310 DQ Mixed 65.9 121% 240 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905428-073.A00LF Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.6 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 72.1 55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	539x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	37x
Radeon HD 7600MAMDBench 4%, 7,895 samples	19x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 5,979 samples	114x
M471B5273EB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 3,287 samples	36x
M471B5273CH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 5,165 samples	25x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $79