HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 years ago, 9 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory5.4 GB free of 10.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110714
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '14 at 19:49
Run Duration523 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 91%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 55.3
2-Core 116
38% 85.8 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 451
40% 341 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 53% Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300
Device(1545 2292) 256MB
Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$70
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA3GH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 108
Write 119
Mixed 79.1
76% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.44
107% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 74%
SAMSUNG HM160HC 160GB
16GB free, PID 6204
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 30.1
Write 24.1
Mixed 27.2
34% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.03
4K Mixed 0.33
48% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 16%
Lexar JumpDrive 16GB
10GB free, PID 0700
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 22.1
Mixed 12.1
25% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.33
4K Write 0.35
4K Mixed 0.28
41% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 28%
hp v125w 8GB
4GB free, PID 3307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
5.14% Terrible
Read 24.9
Write 2.95
Mixed 3.86
9% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.71
4K Write 0.002
4K Mixed 0.002
14% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.14%
Great: 9%
Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback