Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive219% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming K5
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF  (all builds)
Memory29.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 15 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$235
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 122
2-Core 233
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 700
64% 536 Pts
64-Core 1,257
78% 1,257 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 46.3
31% 39.6 fps
MRender 29.3
Gravity 31.9
Splatting 38.7
28% 33.3 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 500GB SSD
401GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303121
SusWrite @10s intervals: 785 588 591 590 589 593 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
219% Outstanding
Read 1,848
Write 1,966
Mixed 1,447
SusWrite 622
330% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 63.8
201% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,159
DQ Write 830
DQ Mixed 992
742% 994 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 219%
Great: 266%
Sandisk SD8SBBU480G1122 480GB
64GB free
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 312 151 69 54 52 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
63% Good
Read 418
Write 410
Mixed 352
SusWrite 117
73% 324 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 17.6
99% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 151
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 28.9
78% 159 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63%
Great: 67%
Adata SU630 960GB
90GB free
Firmware: R1210A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 440 442 110 6.3 212 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 442
Mixed 387
SusWrite 277
90% 403 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 28.2
140% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 43.2
94% 187 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 106%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
71GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 300 299 299 299 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 476
Mixed 424
SusWrite 313
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 62.5
204% 72.5 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 360
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 119%
Great: 124%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
145GB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 159 157 91 86 145 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 158
Write 127
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 132
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 96%
Lexar SS D 512GB
434GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 389 386 385 387 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
204% Outstanding
Read 334
Write 338
Mixed 315
SusWrite 385
473% 343 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 21.5
4K Mixed 20.7
1,516% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.2
DQ Write 34.1
DQ Mixed 19.5
1,898% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 204%
Great: 204%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMU32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.8% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 16.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 22.1
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF Builds (Compare 618 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K5-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback