Asrock H310CM-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H310CM-HG4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190409
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 14 '19 at 16:54
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 74.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 247
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 442
50% 394 Pts
64-Core 406
25% 406 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.20
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 64.3
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 58.2
52% 63 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 63.1
52% 63.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253LE240G 240GB
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 194 85 83 90 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 425
Write 365
Mixed 248
SusWrite 150
66% 297 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 33
115% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 172
162% 250 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 93%
Sony Flash Disk 8GB
4GB free, PID 05ba
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 19 17 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.38% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 18.7
Mixed 6
SusWrite 17.2
21% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
19% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.38%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310CM-HG4 Builds (Compare 813 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback