Today's hottest deals

Oegstone DQ77MK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemOegstone DQ77MK  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory20.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 16:31
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$69
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 112
55% 86.5 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 228
22% 182 Pts
64-Core 261
16% 261 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.39
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.59% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 4.31
Parallax 4.19
3% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.09
4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.59%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 11 37 19 40 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 31.5
Write 64
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 27.4
26% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 17%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST2000VM003-1CT164 2TB
124GB free
Firmware: SC23
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 92 81 93 89 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 117
Write 115
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 90.3
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 100%
Hitachi HTS541680J9SA00 80GB-$76
4GB free
Firmware: SB2OC70P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 26 25 26 24 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Read 19.9
Write 23.3
Mixed 15.3
SusWrite 24.4
15% 20.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 25%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB
0GB free, PID 5400
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 3.2 2.8 1.9 0.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 2.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 2
4% 4.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 14.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.8
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DQ77MK Builds (Compare 237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Oegstone DQ77MK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $381
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback