Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.64% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 10 '19 at 09:55
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 385
52% 389 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.5068
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.64% Terrible
Lighting 5.97
Reflection 8.65
Parallax 5.84
5% 6.82 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 12.8
7% 8.16 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.64%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$25
438GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 126 145 134 133 143 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 171
Write 162
Mixed 36.8
SusWrite 136
91% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU21D4U5S1MB-4 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 9.9
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback