Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	73.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1494
Memory	21.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20111110
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '19 at 16:25
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 87.2 2-Core 173 69% 117 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 335 43% 324 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3772) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 440.97 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	73.5% Very good	Lighting 92.6 Reflection 90.2 Parallax 73.3 75% 85.4 fps	MRender 87.9 Gravity 84 Splatting 84.2 70% 85.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HFS500G32TND-N1A2A 500GB 1,191 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 319GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30000P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 350 332 426 426 427 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Read 464 Write 373 Mixed 357 SusWrite 367 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 46.5 4K Mixed 33.5 108% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 346 261% 349 MB/s
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 248GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 370 431 448 447 447 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 469 Write 401 Mixed 364 SusWrite 399 92% 408 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 53.5 4K Mixed 39.7 128% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 358 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 355 266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 134%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$56 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 931GB free Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 106 106 107 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 103 Write 99.5 Mixed 35.8 SusWrite 106 62% 86 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 24GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.6% Above average	MC Read 17.1 MC Write 18.7 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 15.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	423x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	137x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	86x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 16GBHynixBench 49%, 20 samples	14x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	11x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16