HP xw4600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP xw4600 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AA0h
Memory2.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '19 at 07:15
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8500-$110
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 77.8
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 90.2
46% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 90.7
8-Core 90.1
12% 90.4 Pts
64-Core 90.8
6% 90.8 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 7.16
7% 8.37 fps
MRender 6.86
Gravity 9.67
Splatting 10.4
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
354GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 117 113 116 112 112 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 147
Write 141
Mixed 32
SusWrite 114
78% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
114% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 103%
Compact Flash Card 16GB
6GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 19 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 9.8
Write 22
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 21.6
25% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 3.8
401% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 40GB
null MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
22.3% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.4
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical xw4600 Workstation Builds (Compare 190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP xw4600 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback