Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 112%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '19 at 17:29
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 3700X How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$275
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 310
100% 185 Pts
4-Core 603
8-Core 1,055
100% 829 Pts
64-Core 1,495
92% 1,495 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
MSI(1462 3810) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 114
Parallax 235
113% 163 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 134
Splatting 158
113% 135 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 110%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH512GCST 512GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTLAN103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 93 108 100 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 460
Write 84.8
Mixed 175
SusWrite 101
45% 205 MB/s
4K Read 19.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 37.6
112% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 178
124% 160 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 106%
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
17GB free
Firmware: JE4OA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 44 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 38.6
Write 40
Mixed 20
SusWrite 44
26% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
62% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
154GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 180 170 164 164 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 154
Mixed 85.2
SusWrite 173
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
778GB free
Firmware: AX0A1U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 100 100 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 92.7
Mixed 39.1
SusWrite 99.6
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 0820 1TB
7GB free, PID 0820
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 98 56 57 56 64 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 104
Write 105
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 72.6
114% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 44%
BUFFALO HD-PNFU3 2TB
421GB free, PID 0251
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 82 81 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 76.9
Write 78.6
Mixed 33.1
SusWrite 81.4
90% 67.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 50%
WDC WD10 SPCX-24HWST1 1TB
931GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 100 99 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 105
Write 108
Mixed 60
SusWrite 99.2
125% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 43%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00MMMB0 3TB
419GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 99 99 100 99 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
46.4% Average
Read 125
Write 116
Mixed 73
SusWrite 99.3
136% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
99% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$65
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
89.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 35
89% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 36.4
87% 30.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,013
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback