Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive34% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3  (all builds)
Memory6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130423
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '16 at 10:31
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$203
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 137
60% 98.1 Pts
4-Core 244
8-Core 388
39% 316 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152
Gainward(10B0 11C6) 2GB
CLim: 928 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.95
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 16
Parallax 21.3
15% 18.4 fps
MRender 21.8
Gravity 21.2
Splatting 15.2
15% 19.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.3b Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34% Below average
Read 167
Write 105
Mixed 127
30% 133 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 9.8
65% 24.4 MB/s
DQ Read 24.8
DQ Write 72.2
DQ Mixed 11.2
19% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 34%
Great: 80%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
246GB free, PID ce18
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 28
Write 27.6
Mixed 9.71
26% 21.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.23
74% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 32%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $238
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback