Today's hottest deals

Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '16 at 17:10
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$95
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 79.9
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 117
54% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 330
33% 270 Pts
64-Core 342
21% 342 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 21.19.155.4
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 58.4
Parallax 81.9
55% 69.2 fps
MRender 58.3
Gravity 57.9
Splatting 74.9
53% 63.7 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 496
Write 318
Mixed 339
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 7.95
63% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 23.3
DQ Write 99.6
DQ Mixed 7.95
22% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 97%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2.5TB free
Firmware: VC62 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.5% Good
Read 106
Write 129
Mixed 80.4
78% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.18
54% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 114%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$80
821GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 115
Write 113
Mixed 102
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.18
76% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 2TB-$55
20GB free
Firmware: CV12 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 98
Write 106
Mixed 92
74% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 0.72
4K Mixed 0.12
59% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 113%
WD My Passport 259D 2TB
2TB free, PID 259d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 28.6
Write 27.1
Mixed 28.3
36% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.07
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.07
6% 0.08 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB DDR3-1600 CL11 4GB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
44.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 16.3
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 80.8
50% 80.8 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 287 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback