Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B450-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '19 at 16:49
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 206
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 656
63% 520 Pts
64-Core 875
54% 875 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Lighting 33.5
Reflection 24.7
Parallax 30.2
27% 29.4 fps
MRender 36.6
Gravity 31.8
Splatting 30.8
27% 33.1 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
440GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 413 432 436 435 377 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 483
Write 439
Mixed 427
SusWrite 414
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 46.5
155% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 365
DQ Mixed 297
245% 350 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 110%
Great: 125%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
231GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 93 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 52
Write 50.8
Mixed 41
SusWrite 95.6
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
167GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 70 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
44.5% Average
Read 86.5
Write 74
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 68
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
558GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 83 83 84 83 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 59
Write 63
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 83
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 67%
WDC WD50 00BPKX-22HPJT0 500GB
278GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
Read 83.8
Write 81.5
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 101
111% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.33 MB/s
WDC WD10 EURX-63FH1Y0 1TB
407GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 139
Write 139
Mixed 100
SusWrite 101
160% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
136% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.7% Very good
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 27.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 26.4
SC Mixed 23.1
68% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B450-PLUS Builds (Compare 5,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B450-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $453
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4070 $490Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback