Today's hottest deals

Acer Swift SF113-31

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Swift SF113-31  (all builds)
MotherboardAPL ASAHI_AP
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 22:26
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium N4200
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Memory 39.5
1-Core 50.5
2-Core 97.6
36% 62.5 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 163
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Acer(1025 1190) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.29 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 1.13
Splatting 2.87
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
36GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 167 167 166 168 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 380
Write 362
Mixed 331
SusWrite 166
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 52.9
4K Mixed 32.5
120% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 223
167% 224 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 131%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 38GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 167 167 166 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
Read 289
Write 271
Mixed 268
SusWrite 166
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 5.7
30% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 97.3
DQ Mixed 125
88% 111 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 54%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 74GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 165 167 167 166 168 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 11
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 3.6
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 204
20% 204 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SF113-31 Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF113-31

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback