Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics63.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive154% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 20:21
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6800K-$90
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 647
65% 530 Pts
64-Core 890
55% 890 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
EVGA(3842 6368) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.8% Good
Lighting 81.8
Reflection 79.5
Parallax 68.7
67% 76.7 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 72.9
Splatting 71
58% 71.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Visiontek 1TB 1TB
494GB free (System drive)
Firmware: C2.3.21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 724 935 927 887 302 291 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 732
Write 899
Mixed 693
SusWrite 678
170% 750 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 47.6
173% 67.2 MB/s
DQ Read 586
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 588
466% 641 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 154%
Great: 154%
Generic Mass-Storage 32GB
13GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1 4 4.7 4.3 4.6 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 3.2
Mixed 2
SusWrite 4.5
6% 6.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 19%
ST3000DM 003-1F216N 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 41 46 47 47 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
20.9% Poor
Read 61.2
Write 79.5
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 44.9
79% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 53%
ST325031 0AS 250GB
186GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 57 58 59 61 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 58.8
Write 75.5
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 59.3
82% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 37%
Seagate USB 3.0 Cable 1TB
648GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 32 32 51 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 25.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 26
SusWrite 40.4
46% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
32% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
109% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 39.7
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 109%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $664
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback