Acer Aspire ES1-512

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 15%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-512  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire ES1-512
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150720
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 20:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2930
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 20.5
2-Core 41.1
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 65.8
8-Core 71.2
9% 68.5 Pts
64-Core 78.8
5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Acer(1025 0936) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4276
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.89% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 1
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.52
1% 1.4 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.89%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 93 81 93 94 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 90.1
Write 90.6
Mixed 52.6
SusWrite 89.6
59% 80.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 61%
USB Disk 4GB
4GB free, PID 3234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Read 2.8
Write 1.5
Mixed 2
SusWrite 1.6
2% 1.98 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LFS1KBG/2G 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
21.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 6.8
22% 7.57 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-512 Builds (Compare 466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-512

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback