Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140711
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 04:21
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 99.2
2-Core 204
75% 131 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 573
58% 472 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.4% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 38.1
33% 36.8 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 37.3
31% 38.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 351
Mixed 194
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 16.8
112% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 114
129% 220 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
103GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 78 79 80 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 91.2
Write 95.2
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 78.5
61% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 125 125 127 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 119
Write 111
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 125
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 84%
Generic Storage Device 8GB
1GB free, PID 0310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.8% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 13.3
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 13.5
16% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.9
162% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 78.C1GET.AU10C 0112 78.C1GET.CP10C 0112 78.C1GET.CP10C 0112 78.C1GET.AU10C 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.6% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 19.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $414

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $846
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback