MSI B85-G43 GAMING (MS-7816)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7816
MotherboardMSI B85-G43 GAMING (MS-7816)  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 22:35
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 91
1-Core 93.2
2-Core 187
73% 124 Pts
4-Core 350
8-Core 365
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
MSI(1462 7816) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5067
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.38% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.65
Parallax 5.56
3% 4.85 fps
MRender 8.05
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 6.65
5% 5.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.38%
Great: 3%
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3747) 2GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
28.3% Poor
Lighting 34.9
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 32.6
28% 30.9 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 32.4
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV400S 120GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 79 56 53 57 54 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 489
Write 348
Mixed 132
SusWrite 82.3
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 37
135% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 89.5
DQ Mixed 109
104% 170 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
736GB free
Firmware: 1A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 173 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 165
Mixed 114
SusWrite 169
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 109%
WDC WD10 JPVX-00JC3T0 1TB
726GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 36 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
Read 38
Write 35.8
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 36.2
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
61.1% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 18.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85-G43 GAMING (MS-7816) Builds (Compare 1,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI B85-G43 GAMING (MS-7816) - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $584
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback